Freqtrade
The reference open-source bot: free, auditable, keys never leave your machine - at the cost of Python skills and patience.
Exchange-native bots and open-source frameworks - no subscription, ever.
Short answer: Freqtrade is our top-rated free bot as of 2026-10-18 (8.1/10), free.
bots on this page: 31 · fully reviewed (active): 31 · free or with a free tier: 31 · need no third-party API keys: 23
quick picks
The reference open-source bot: free, auditable, keys never leave your machine - at the cost of Python skills and patience.
The open-source market-making framework - community-owned, 318 connectors, and the only bot line with institutional-grade pedigree.
Polished multi-exchange grid/DCA platform with 17 exchanges, 7-day no-card trial and solid support reputation.
The quant's choice: MIT-licensed research framework where backtesting is free forever and lifetime licenses unlock live trading - clean model, serious tooling.
Open-source Python bot with web UI and plugin ecosystem - the friendliest on-ramp into self-hosted bot trading.
Performance-fee-only copy investing (10% on net profits, high-water mark) with licensed administration - the honest alternative to subscription bots.
The easiest no-code entry into bot trading - if-this-then-that rules across crypto, on-chain and even stocks, with a real free tier.
The most ambitious open-source project in the niche: visual strategy design, data pipelines and a token economy - steep curve, zero cost, no data collection.
Veteran cloud platform with a genuine free tier, AI strategy designer and the broadest copy-bot marketplace.
16 free built-in bots inside the exchange itself - zero subscription and no third-party API keys, at 0.05% per side.
The TradingView-signal specialist: real free tier, 30-50% lifetime affiliate program and free Premium tools when trading on Hyperliquid.
Terminal-plus-bots for active traders - strong scanners, 5-day no-card trial and a real 30-day refund window.
Public-domain (Unlicense) grid/martingale futures bot for Bybit, OKX, Binance, Bitget and Hyperliquid - raw power for developers, invisible for everyone else.
Volume-fee instead of subscription-first: pay-as-you-go at 0.1% per trade, with $MZR staking cutting fees up to 20x - innovative pricing, api-key custody on CEX side.
Free grid and DCA bots inside Binance Trading Bots - no third-party API keys, you pay only trading fees.
Bitget's copy-trading market - native to the exchange, public stats, profit share to traders.
Copy traders inside Bybit - your funds stay in your own exchange account, stats are public, profit share applies.
Free grid and DCA bots inside OKX Trading Bots - no third-party API keys, you pay only trading fees.
Free grid and DCA bots inside Gate.io Trading Bots - no third-party API keys, you pay only trading fees.
Popular free grid/DCA bots in-app - the futures grid is community-endorsed, the reinvest option has been buggy.
Free grid and DCA bots inside Bitget Trading Bots - no third-party API keys, you pay only trading fees.
Free grid and DCA bots inside Bybit Trading Bots - no third-party API keys, you pay only trading fees.
Beginner-focused cloud platform for grid/DCA - pricing unverifiable from here, so treat plan details as indicative.
The Solana terminal that challenged Photon: 0.7% fees, perps and sub-second execution - anonymous team, expensive segment.
The established Telegram sniper (four chains, own $BANANA token) - fees honestly documented: 0.5% manual / 1% snipes.
Multi-chain sniper terminal (Solana/ETH/BSC/Base) with perps - ~1% fees, JS-only site, treat details as reported.
The most-used Solana memecoin sniper web app - extremely fast, extremely expensive per trade, extremely risky segment.
Memecoin terminal with wallet-copy features (Solana/Tron/Base) - ~1% fees (reported), scam-adjacent segment documented with caution.
The EVM-chain Telegram veteran: trade monitors, positions ledger, multi TP/SL - ~1% fees (reported), anonymous team.
Telegram-first Solana sniper with web mirror - ~0.9% fees (reported), classic sniper risk profile.
The BONK-ecosystem Telegram bot for Solana swaps and sniping - ~1% fees (reported), Telegram-only, memecoin-native.
| Bot | Type | Price | Trade fee | Free tier | Trial | Backtest | Paper | Exchanges | US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted | free | - | yes | - | yes | yes | 11 | US | |
| Self-hosted | free | - | yes | - | yes | yes | 50 | US | |
| Cloud platform | $23-149/mo | - | yes | 7 days, no card | yes | yes | 17 | US | |
| Self-hosted | $0-1599/mo | - | yes | - | yes | yes | 12 | US | |
| Self-hosted | $0-29.99/mo | - | yes | 7 days, no card | yes | yes | 12 | US | |
| Zignaly | Copy trading | unknown | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cloud platform | 0.02% of volume | - | yes | - | - | - | 20 | US | |
| Self-hosted | free | - | yes | - | yes | yes | 15 | US | |
| Cloud platform | $29-129/mo | - | yes | 3 days, no card | yes | yes | 16 | US | |
| Pionex | Exchange-native | 0.05% per trade | 0.05% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | US |
| Cloud platform | $0-100/mo | - | yes | 7 days, no card | - | yes | 18 | US | |
| Cloud platform | $30-97/mo | - | yes | 5 days, no card | yes | yes | 17 | US | |
| Self-hosted | free | - | yes | - | yes | yes | 8 | US | |
| Mizar | Cloud platform | 0.1% of volume | - | yes | - | yes | - | 10 | - |
| Exchange-native | free | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Bitget Copy Trading | Copy trading | unknown | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bybit Copy Trading | Copy trading | unknown | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| Exchange-native | free | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Gate.io Trading Bots | Exchange-native | free | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| Exchange-native | free | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Exchange-native | free | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Bybit Trading Bots | Exchange-native | free | - | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| TradeSanta | Cloud platform | $14-70/mo | - | yes | 14 days, no card | - | - | 8 | US |
| Axiom | DEX / Telegram sniper | 0.7% per trade | 0.7% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| DEX / Telegram sniper | 1% per trade | 1% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| DEX / Telegram sniper | 1% per trade | 1% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Photon | DEX / Telegram sniper | 0.9% per trade | 0.9% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| GMGN | DEX / Telegram sniper | 1% per trade | 1% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| DEX / Telegram sniper | 1% per trade | 1% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Trojan | DEX / Telegram sniper | 0.9% per trade | 0.9% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
| BONKbot | DEX / Telegram sniper | 1% per trade | 1% per trade | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
Live values from our database - details and caveats in each review. "-" = not documented.
31 bots match the no-subscription filter on this page - but they bill through four different doors, and picking the wrong door costs more than a subscription. The figure below is the annual bill at $10,000 monthly traded volume:
31 of the 31 bots here are free or carry a free tier, and 6 add a trial window of up to 14 days. The pattern to understand before choosing: free tiers are calibration tools. Their limits (one bot, limited connections, no backtesting) are designed to surface value, not to host a production strategy. Two failure modes follow, both self-inflicted: paying nothing while running a strategy you cannot backtest, or compensating for the one-bot limit by stacking aggressive settings into it. The calculator-first alternative is boring and effective - price the paid tier against the free tier's realistic output using the bot cost calculator, then decide.
The free community evidence is real, though. The best-known free-bot test - the 78-vs-1000-grid run on Pionex's native bots - produced annualized figures that professional platforms would advertise, before fees[6]. Free software on a free exchange feature, tested properly, is a serious setup; it is not a lesser lane.

Ranging and accumulation, no keys, no bills: Pionex (0.05%[3]) and Binance/OKX/Gate native bots. Pick this if your strategies are grid/DCA shaped and you accept one exchange's markets.
Strategy development and full control: Freqtrade (Python, backtesting, dry-run, 11 exchanges[1]) or Hummingbot (market making, 318 connectors[2]). Free like a puppy: the initial cost is nothing, the ongoing care is the price.
Cloud features on a budget: WunderTrading's free tier for webhook-driven single bots, then its $10-25/mo steps. TradeSanta's 14-day trial is the longest full-featured window on this page - enough to actually test a strategy, not just the dashboard.
Memecoin sniping: genuinely free software, but read the [per-trade fee section](#free-is-a-cost-model-not-a-price) again before assuming that makes it cheap. The sniper lane carries that category's full risk ledger.
The reason exchange-native bots anchor this page: their fee schedule is the floor under every other lane's pricing. Pionex bills 0.05% per side on spot[3]; Binance's regular tier is 0.1% per side, 0.075% with the BNB discount[4]. On a strategy that turns over its capital 50 times a month, that fee line alone is 2.5-5% of capital monthly - the entire budget every subscription platform competes against. When a paid platform promises "better execution", the honest comparison is against this floor, not against zero.
API capacity is the second floor dimension. Exchange-native bots consume no personal API quota at all; cloud and self-hosted bots trade against venue rate limits and key handling rules that venues like OKX document per endpoint[7]. Free tiers of cloud platforms often sit on the same rate limits as paid tiers - the throttle there is feature-gating, not capacity.
The subscription-free universe is where marketing and reality diverge most. A paid platform sells orchestration; a free lane gives you raw mechanics and asks you to supply the discipline. Three honest readings help: first, the free evidence base is real - community tests on free native bots produced professional-grade annualized numbers[6], and OSS frameworks power serious operations. Second, the throttle points are real - freemium caps, OSS ops, per-trade fees - and they bite exactly when your strategy starts working. Third, "free" attracts predatory clones more than any other pitch; the scam-pattern guide and the FTC's patterns[8] are the filter to run before any download.
If you are deciding between this lane and a subscription, the sequence that works: start exchange-native at small size, add an OSS framework if you need strategy depth, and only pay a subscription when you can name the specific feature you are paying for - cross-exchange orchestration, webhook plumbing, or marketplace signals. That order keeps every invoice earned.
One more honesty note on the sniper lane, because it skews every average on this page: 31 includes the wallet bots, and their per-trade fees mean the "free" label is technically true and practically misleading for them. If your interest is sniping, budget for the fee line first - the sniper lane prices each bot per trade with the fee stack broken out.
Exchange-native bots are genuinely good and genuinely free - Pionex charges only its 0.05% trading fee and Binance/OKX/KuCoin/Bybit/Bitget/Gate include bots with the account. Open-source bots (Freqtrade, Hummingbot) are free software with professional track records. The catch is never the software; it is the cost model around it.
Limits. WunderTrading's free tier allows one bot of each type; Cryptohopper's free Explorer plan caps positions and features. Fine for testing, a throttle for production - and a reason some traders overload their single allowed bot instead of upgrading.
Their software is free to install - they charge per trade instead, 0.7-1% per execution. At $10k monthly volume that is $840-1,200 a year, more than most subscriptions. They match this page's "no subscription" filter, which is exactly why the cost model matters.
The license is. Freqtrade needs a 2GB-RAM machine minimum[1] - a VPS runs $5-20/mo - plus your setup and maintenance time. Hummingbot publishes 318 connectors and years of releases free[2]. You pay in ops, not invoices.
The exchange's normal schedule: Pionex 0.05% per side[3], Binance 0.1% (0.075% with BNB)[4]. On a dense grid that fee line is the main cost of "free" - our grid fee sweep shows fees eating 20-100% of realized profit at high densities.
Yes - exchange-native bots run inside your account with no third-party keys at all. Wallet-connected DEX bots use your wallet instead. The [no-API-key lane](/best/no-api-key/) lists both groups; the open-source route keeps keys on your own machine.
Open source does (Freqtrade and Hummingbot both ship it[1][2]). Freemium tiers usually reserve backtesting for paid plans - Bitsgap's free tier is for testing the interface, not strategies. Check the plan matrix before building a strategy on a tier that cannot test it.
An exchange-native grid or DCA bot at small size plus paper trading - zero software risk, zero subscription, real market mechanics. Graduate to a paid cloud platform only when you need cross-exchange logic, TradingView webhooks or deeper configurators.
Three: freemium throttles that push you into oversized single-bot configs, clone sites that use "free bot" as the lure for phishing (the FTC's scam patterns apply verbatim[8]), and OSS deployments left unmonitored on a VPS. None are exotic; all are common.
It stacks subscription, per-trade and volume fees over time so you can compare the "free" lanes against paid platforms on the same axis - the honest answer is volume-dependent.
No. Exchange-native bots execute on the same matching engine as manual orders; OSS bots place the same API orders as paid tools. Execution differences come from the venue's fee schedule and API rate limits[7], not the software price tag.